Review





Similar Products

96
Bio-Rad rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80
Rat Anti Mouse Monoclonal F4 80, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Rat+anti+Mouse+F4%2F80/10__22203_slash_ecm__v033a11-129-8-16
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti mouse monoclonal f4 80 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
ABclonal Biotechnology flag
Flag, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+DDDDK-Tag+mAb/pmc13570308-249-17-18
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
ABclonal Biotechnology anti flag
Anti Flag, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+DDDDK-Tag+mAb/pmc13604470-109-27-29
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti flag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology mouse anti his monoclonal antibody
Mouse Anti His Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+His-Tag+mAb/pmc13585231-98-20-25
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti his monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology mouse anti his tag mab
Mouse Anti His Tag Mab, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+His-Tag+mAb/pm42747182-294-21-24
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti his tag mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
ABclonal Biotechnology mouse monoclonal anti ha
Mouse Monoclonal Anti Ha, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Custom+Mouse+Monoclonal+Antibody+Production/pm42749201-53-7-17
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse monoclonal anti ha - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology mouse anti gst
Mouse Anti Gst, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+GST-Tag+mAb/pmc13583106-254-8-31
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti gst - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
ABclonal Biotechnology mouse anti his
Mouse Anti His, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+His-Tag+mAb/pmc13583106-254-0-31
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti his - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
ABclonal Biotechnology anti ha
FAM134B targets the ASFV proteins p72 and pA137R for degradation via reticulophagy. (A–C) FAM134B interacts with p72, and pA137R. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with pFlag‐p72 (A) or pFlag‐A137R (B) together with pHA‐FAM134B. The cells were lysed and whole cell lysates (WCL) were immunoprecipitated with <t>an</t> <t>anti‐HA</t> monoclonal antibody (mAb) at 36 h post‐transfection (hpt). The immunoprecipitates were examined by immunoblotting (IB). WSL cells were infected with ASFV‐WT at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. At 24 h post‐infection (hpi), the cells were lysed for immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti‐FAM134B. Anti‐IgG antibodies were used as a negative control (C). (D–G) FAM134B degrades p72 and pA137R via the autophagy‐lysosomal pathway. WSL cells were transfected with pFlag‐FAM134B, followed by infection with ASFV‐WT at an MOI of 1 and treatment with Lac (20 µM), MG132 (20 µM), CQ (50 µM), or BafA1 (100 nM) for 8 h at 16 hpi. The cell lysates were analyzed by IB (D, E). The ATG5 ‐knockout ( ATG5‐ KO) or wild‐type (WT) HEK293T cells were transfected with pFlag‐FAM134B, followed by infection with ASFV‐P31 at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (F, G). (H–L) The degradation of p72 and pA137R mediated by FAM134B depends on the LIR motif of FAM134B. WSL cells were transfected with pHA‐FAM134B or pHA‐FAM134B‐ΔLIR, followed by infection with ASFV‐WT at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (H, I). Wild‐type HEK293T cells, along with FAM134B ‐KO cells reconstituted with wild‐type FAM134B (WT‐ FAM134B ‐R) or the LIR mutant (ΔLIR‐ FAM134B ‐R), were infected with ASFV‐P31 at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (J, K). Additionally, viral titers were quantified (L). (M–P) Co‐localization of FAM134B with LC3B and ASFV p72 (M, N) or pA137R (O, P). HEK293T cells were cotransfected with the indicated plasmids and protein colocalization was analyzed by confocal microscopy. The data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA for the data in panels (E, G, I, K, and L), and by two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test for the data in panels (N) and (P) (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).
Anti Ha, supplied by ABclonal Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mouse+monoclonal+antibody/Mouse+anti+HA-Tag+mAb/pmc13583106-254-13-31
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti ha - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FAM134B targets the ASFV proteins p72 and pA137R for degradation via reticulophagy. (A–C) FAM134B interacts with p72, and pA137R. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with pFlag‐p72 (A) or pFlag‐A137R (B) together with pHA‐FAM134B. The cells were lysed and whole cell lysates (WCL) were immunoprecipitated with an anti‐HA monoclonal antibody (mAb) at 36 h post‐transfection (hpt). The immunoprecipitates were examined by immunoblotting (IB). WSL cells were infected with ASFV‐WT at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. At 24 h post‐infection (hpi), the cells were lysed for immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti‐FAM134B. Anti‐IgG antibodies were used as a negative control (C). (D–G) FAM134B degrades p72 and pA137R via the autophagy‐lysosomal pathway. WSL cells were transfected with pFlag‐FAM134B, followed by infection with ASFV‐WT at an MOI of 1 and treatment with Lac (20 µM), MG132 (20 µM), CQ (50 µM), or BafA1 (100 nM) for 8 h at 16 hpi. The cell lysates were analyzed by IB (D, E). The ATG5 ‐knockout ( ATG5‐ KO) or wild‐type (WT) HEK293T cells were transfected with pFlag‐FAM134B, followed by infection with ASFV‐P31 at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (F, G). (H–L) The degradation of p72 and pA137R mediated by FAM134B depends on the LIR motif of FAM134B. WSL cells were transfected with pHA‐FAM134B or pHA‐FAM134B‐ΔLIR, followed by infection with ASFV‐WT at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (H, I). Wild‐type HEK293T cells, along with FAM134B ‐KO cells reconstituted with wild‐type FAM134B (WT‐ FAM134B ‐R) or the LIR mutant (ΔLIR‐ FAM134B ‐R), were infected with ASFV‐P31 at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (J, K). Additionally, viral titers were quantified (L). (M–P) Co‐localization of FAM134B with LC3B and ASFV p72 (M, N) or pA137R (O, P). HEK293T cells were cotransfected with the indicated plasmids and protein colocalization was analyzed by confocal microscopy. The data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA for the data in panels (E, G, I, K, and L), and by two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test for the data in panels (N) and (P) (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: FAM134B Restricts African Swine Fever Virus Capsid Assembly via Reticulophagy and Its Antiviral Activity is Antagonized by the Viral Virulence‐Associated Factor pMGF300‐2R

doi: 10.1002/advs.77741

Figure Lengend Snippet: FAM134B targets the ASFV proteins p72 and pA137R for degradation via reticulophagy. (A–C) FAM134B interacts with p72, and pA137R. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with pFlag‐p72 (A) or pFlag‐A137R (B) together with pHA‐FAM134B. The cells were lysed and whole cell lysates (WCL) were immunoprecipitated with an anti‐HA monoclonal antibody (mAb) at 36 h post‐transfection (hpt). The immunoprecipitates were examined by immunoblotting (IB). WSL cells were infected with ASFV‐WT at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. At 24 h post‐infection (hpi), the cells were lysed for immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti‐FAM134B. Anti‐IgG antibodies were used as a negative control (C). (D–G) FAM134B degrades p72 and pA137R via the autophagy‐lysosomal pathway. WSL cells were transfected with pFlag‐FAM134B, followed by infection with ASFV‐WT at an MOI of 1 and treatment with Lac (20 µM), MG132 (20 µM), CQ (50 µM), or BafA1 (100 nM) for 8 h at 16 hpi. The cell lysates were analyzed by IB (D, E). The ATG5 ‐knockout ( ATG5‐ KO) or wild‐type (WT) HEK293T cells were transfected with pFlag‐FAM134B, followed by infection with ASFV‐P31 at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (F, G). (H–L) The degradation of p72 and pA137R mediated by FAM134B depends on the LIR motif of FAM134B. WSL cells were transfected with pHA‐FAM134B or pHA‐FAM134B‐ΔLIR, followed by infection with ASFV‐WT at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (H, I). Wild‐type HEK293T cells, along with FAM134B ‐KO cells reconstituted with wild‐type FAM134B (WT‐ FAM134B ‐R) or the LIR mutant (ΔLIR‐ FAM134B ‐R), were infected with ASFV‐P31 at an MOI of 1. At 24 hpi, the expression levels of p72, pA137R, and FAM134B were analyzed by IB (J, K). Additionally, viral titers were quantified (L). (M–P) Co‐localization of FAM134B with LC3B and ASFV p72 (M, N) or pA137R (O, P). HEK293T cells were cotransfected with the indicated plasmids and protein colocalization was analyzed by confocal microscopy. The data are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by one‐way ANOVA for the data in panels (E, G, I, K, and L), and by two‐tailed unpaired t ‐test for the data in panels (N) and (P) (ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).

Article Snippet: Mouse anti‐His (AE003), rabbit anti‐ β ‐tubulin (A12289), mouse anti‐GST (AE001), anti‐Flag (AE005), anti‐HA (AE008), anti‐ glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (AC033), and anti‐GFP (AE012) and rabbit anti‐HA (AE105) antibodies were purchased from ABclonal Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Rabbit anti‐RFP (BGT‐ANT‐45233) antibodies were purchased from Biogradetech.

Techniques: Immunoprecipitation, Transfection, Western Blot, Infection, Negative Control, Knock-Out, Expressing, Mutagenesis, Confocal Microscopy, Two Tailed Test